Were you distracted?

Were you distracted by the shooting at the D.C. Navy Yard?  Many people were.  I know that there are several people out there calling this a false flag event already. 

What is a False flag?  A False flag (or black flag) describes covert military or paramilitary operations designed to deceive in such a way that the operations appear as though they are being carried out by other entities, groups or nations than those who actually planned and executed them. Operations carried during peace-time by civilian organizations, as well as covert government agencies, may by extension be called false flag operations if they seek to hide the real organisation behind an operation.

I don’t believe this was a false flag.  However, I do believe the Obama Regime used this event as a distraction to do other insidious things, like waiving the law that bans arming known terrorist organizations.  Yeah, you read right.

President Barack Obama on Monday announced he would waive the federal law intended to prevent the supply of arms to terrorists groups so the U.S. can provide arms and other military assistance to the Syrian rebels, the Washington Examiner’s Joel Gehrke reports.

My thoughts are this; why would you arms the enemy just because there are some within the group who may or may not be our enemy, too?  It’s plain stupidity.  Nothing less or more.  It’s just plain stupidity.

Anyway, I bet you didn’t even notice that he did that.  You were likely too busy watching the goings on in DC; horrified that this guy was walking around killing people.

The Washington Examiner reports:

The president, citing his authority under the Arms Export Control Act, announced today that he would “waive the prohibitions in sections 40 and 40A of the AECA related to such a transaction.”

Those two sections prohibit sending weaponry to countries described in section 40(d): “The prohibitions contained in this section apply with respect to a country if the Secretary of State determines that the government of that country has repeatedly provided support for acts of international terrorism,” Congress stated in the Arms Control Export Act.

“For purposes of this subsection, such acts shall include all activities that the Secretary determines willfully aid or abet the international proliferation of nuclear explosive devices to individuals or groups or willfully aid or abet an individual or groups in acquiring unsafeguarded special nuclear material,” the law continues.

The president of the United States has the authority to waive the restrictions if he “determines that the transaction is essential to the national security interests of the United States.”

Tell me how this is essential to the national security of the US.  It’s not.  There is no argument you can present before me that will convince me that the Syrian civil war has anything to do whatsoever with US national security.

I believe we should follow Switzerland’s model of neutrality.  How many wars have we been in since 1900?  What about undelcared wars?  How many terror attacks have we suffered at home and abroad?

Now, lets have a look at the Swiss.  How many wars have they been in since 1900?  How many terror attacks have they suffered?

What about their crime rates?  Compare them to ours.  Gun politics in Switzerland are unique in Europe. Switzerland does not have a standing army, instead opting for a people’s militia for its national defense. The vast majority of men between the ages of 20 and 30 are conscripted into the militia and undergo military training, including weapons training. The personal weapons of the militia are kept at home as part of the military obligations; Switzerland thus has one of the highest militia gun ownership rates in the world. In recent times a minority of political opposition has expressed a desire for tighter gun regulations. A referendum in February 2011 rejected stricter gun control.

Here, and crime statisticis have proven, areas with tight gun control restrictions have high crime rates.  Look at Chicago, New York, Detroit, and Washington, DC.

Now I know I’m all over the place here, but my main point is that the president and Congress will use the Navy Yard shooting as a distraction to issue executive orders and for Congress to pass laws furthering their gun control policies and to arm our enemies abroad.

On top of that, the US should have a policy, no, MUST have a policy of neutrality at all cost.  Don’t drag us into another war.  Don’t police the globe.  Don’t use distractions to push globalist and anti-liberty agenda.  That’s my message today.

Were you distracted or are you plugged in?

Advertisements

One Comment to “Were you distracted?”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: