Posts tagged ‘welfare state’

16 July, 2012

Welfare and work… this is messed up, people!

So our country is going broke, no it IS broke.  People refuse to work, choosing to go on welfare with their sense of entitlement.  I mean, why work for it when the government will just give it to you, right?  That’s the mentality of a huge ortion of Americans these days.  I know some of these people personally.  They make me angry with that attitude.  They make me angry to the point I just can’t talk to them.  We all know someone who’d rather get everything they need for free.  I call these people “victims.”  They’re “victims” because nothing goes their way, everyone is against them, life just has it in for them.  Whatever, they’re nothing but lazy.  There’s a difference between those who really need it and those who feel they deserve it.  Well, President Obama, good ol’ Barry, our SIC (Socialist in Charge), our dictator, whatever you want to call him, has made it easier to stay on welfare and enslave us all to a government-run-everthing life.

read more »

Advertisements
25 May, 2012

How do you know when you have the wrong person as president?

How do you know that you’ve chosen the person to be the president of the United States?  Well, first of all, they take your freedoms away in the guise of giving more security and liberty.  Second, they appoint only people with an extreme agenda to positions of power.  And third, they have Communists, or other enemies of freedom, endorsing them and they themselves have been involved in socialist movements.  Would you vote for someone like that? 

Would you vote for someone who does more damage to our country while bragging about how good they’ve been for us?  Would you trust a president who likes to act like we’re the bad guys in the world and he wants us to be more like other countries?

Would you ever vote for a president who thinks so lowly of you and your opinions that he or she would subvert the Constitution and the Congress in an effort to make the nation how they think it should be?

Hopefully, the answer is no.  No you wouldn’t want someone like that as president.  Well, guess what, people.  I’m sorry to tell you that those who don’t want to have to work for what they have, those who want a welfare state, those who fear life to the point they want government to take care of them, those sitting on the left did it.  We have that president.  His name is Barrack Obama, or as I like to call him Ol’ Barry O’bamy. 

Obama endorsed by Fidel Castro’s Niece

Folks, I want you to think about something.  If our current president was the right guy for the job, if he was right for our country, do you think he would have received an endorsement from Mariela Castro, Fidel Castro’s niece?

Cuban President Raul Castro’s daughter arrived in San Francisco, CA to nothing less than applause from the crowds (go figure, it’s San Francisco).
Keep in mind, Castro’s visa approval to the United States sparked a political outcry that reached the presidential campaign this week.  So hopefully, the GOP candidates… well candidate, I guess you really can’t count Ron Paul any more, understand that he can use this to his advantage.  While people on the left, generally, don’t care about letting dictators, terrorists, and family member of either into the country, conservatives and patriots do.
 
The day before Mariela Castro’s arrival Monday, Mitt Romney chided the administration for “welcoming the daughter of a dictator” and he went on to say, “We shouldn’t be extending an open hand to a regime engaged in the systematic and flagrant denial of basic human rights.”  Romney is right, people.  As a three percenter forever, I agree that our Constitution and way of life should be respected.  Allowing the daughter of a dictator whose family is responsible for such horrific crimes and human rights violations is a slap in the face of all those who defend our nation.  It’s also an insult to the people who came to this country from Cuba to get away from such behavior.
Even though she primarily focused her hour-long talk on medical issues, she couldn’t help herself, but to insert herself into our politics by condemning the U.S. embargo on Cuba and calling its supporters “a tiny mafia” who have “no scruples.” Really, Ms. Castro?  No scruples?  This coming from a family who has slaughtered thousands of people for having different political views or for being in direct competition with your father and uncle.  I guess such a family would know what a tiny mafia is, huh.
 
Ms. Castro went on to say that she would vote for Obama, that she’s happy he supports gay marriage, and that she believes he’s sincere and speaks from the heart.
On top of all that, leave it liberal havens such as San Francisco to welcome her with open arms and praise.
 
Speaking before Democratic Socialists!

Ol Barry was the speaker at an event sponsored and presented by the Democratic Socialists of America, the DSA.  The DSA is a far left leaning group, obviously, that supports a welfare state, or a nanny state.

According to the archive of the DSA’s March-April 1996 newsletter, New Ground, reviewed by WND, Obama reportedly addressed a crowd of over 300 people, discussing a theme from his campaign, “What does it take to create productive communities?”

Obama reportedly outlined how government can play “constructive” roles in bettering society.

Reported the DSA newsletter:

One of the themes that has emerged in Barack Obama’s campaign is ’what does it take to create productive communities,’ not just consumptive communities. It is an issue that joins some of the best instincts of the conservatives with the better instincts of the left. He felt the state government has three constructive roles to play.

The first is ’human capital development.’ By this he meant public education, welfare reform, and a ‘workforce preparation strategy.’ Public education requires equality in funding. It’s not that money is the only solution to public education’s problems but it’s a start toward a solution. The current proposals for welfare reform are intended to eliminate welfare but it’s also true that the status quo is not tenable.

A true welfare system would provide for medical care, child care and job training. While Barack Obama did not use this term, it sounded very much like the ‘social wage’ approach used by many social democratic labor parties. By ‘workforce preparation strategy,’ Barack Obama simply meant a coordinated, purposeful program of job training instead of the ad hoc, fragmented approach used by the State of Illinois today.

The state government can also play a role in redistribution, the allocation of wages and jobs. As Barack Obama noted, when someone gets paid $10 million to eliminate 4,000 jobs, the voters in his district know this is an issue of power not economics. The government can use as tools labor law reform, public works and contracts.

Keep in mind, folks that DSA is part of Socialist International.  They are the largest socialist organization in the world.  No freedom loving American should ever have to worry about socialists taking over and putting you in a nanny state.

This is the type of person we have in office right now.  This is who Barrack Obama is, folks.  Do we really want four more years of this?  I don’t.  I’ll take my chances with Romney; see what he does.  Maybe he’ll be decent, maybe he’ll suck.  We don’t know yet, but we already know Obama sucks as president.

So the question was, how do you when you have the wrong person as president?  The answer, look at where we are now.

%d bloggers like this: